Is 8000 the bottom? The staff at tech:stocker have said all along that 8000 is the bottom and with the market closing three points below that number today, tomorrow will test our prediction once again. For the record, we did say the market could touch 7800 briefly but if we truly are correct, the market should gain some ground in the next day or two. We think 8000 is the bottom for two distinct reasons.
First, the tech companies that were the basis for our last recession are in much better financial condition than they were in 2001. The staff at tech:stocker would have a hard time finding a tech company selling for $200 a share that didn't have positive returns each quarter. Companies like Apple (AAPL:NASDAQ), Cisco (CSCO:NASDAQ), Google (GOOG:NASDAQ), Hewlett Packard (HPQ:NASDAQ), and Intel (INTC:NASDAQ) are just a few examples of companies that have plenty of cash to not only survive this economic downturn, but actually profit from it if they make the right moves.
Second, a lot of the financial advisers we speak with regularly say their clients with cash reserves want to invest each time the market hits 8000. With the government generously doling out TARP money to just about any bank that asks, we hear that this has given many investors some level of confidence in these extraordinary times. Since most investors view financial services companies as the whipping boy for this recession (just as tech stocks were the whipping boy for the last recession), seeing the government answer the call to action has provided a certain amount of faith in these companies. Thus, investors don't think the market should return to low of the 2001 crash (7600).
And speaking of TARP money, where is eTrade's (ETFC:NASDAQ) $800m? With the stock closing just South of $1.00 today, it easily slid past our revised 12-month target price of $1.25. If you've been shorting this stock, you've made some money.
So will eTrade get its TARP money? With the company's now worth at approximately $538m, asking for $800m seems fairly laughable when compared to the $25b Wells Fargo (WFC:NYSE) received and their market cap of $81b. Is Henry Paulson looking to make an example of eTrade?
Considering that American Express (AXP:NYSE), Goldman Sachs (GS:NYSE), and Hartford Financial Group (HIG:NYSE) have also applied for "free cheese" and haven't heard whether or not they will get any, it's easy to think that it's only a matter of time before eTrade gets their cheddar. But as each day passes, investors in the online trader should be getting more nervous.
While eTrade tried to pacify investors with numbers saying their DARTs (Daily Average Revenue Trades) were up and their drop in client assets was inline with the drop in the markets. CEO Donald Layton touted that they had a record number of new accounts opened in October. Unfortunately, this is almost worthless as anyone can open an account without depositing a dime. And with the stock closing under $1 today, the company really needs to tout statistics that show revenue growth, if they are available.
Still, we look at the current share price and envision two scenarios. The first involves eTrade getting their TARP money and the share price climbs to $1.50 as they still have way too many bad loans on their books. The second scenario involves the company not receiving any TARP money and eventually gets seized by the FDIC. We had heard rumors about a third scenario involving a few financial services firms that were kicking the tires on eTrade but those rumors are no longer being floated.
If we had to pick, we think the FDIC is going to take over because Mr. Paulson is going to play the role of "Scrooge" to eTrade's upcoming Christmas Story thus we can't recommend buying eTrade stock. But if you think Mr. Paulson is truly a generous guy who just wants to give everything he can to help a crippled online trader, now is definitely the time to buy eTrade.
When the market opened this morning and immediately started into a death spiral, the staff at tech:stocker was convinced that the Dow would not be able to pull up. Unfortunately, we were right and our prediction of 8000 being the bottom was incorrect. Unless the market miraculously gains 700 – 800 points tomorrow, the bottom appears to be lower than 8000.
While this day was certainly ugly, two stocks that are regular targets of this column, Salesforce.com (CRM:NASDAQ) and eDiets.com (DIET:NASDAQ) actually had gains today. To the credit of Salesforce.com, they did have a great quarter by increasing their customer base by 36% and their diluted eps by $0.03 compared to the same quarter in the previous year. While we still look at this stock and wonder why people would choose Salesforce.com with its P/E ratio of 81 versus Google and its P/E ratio of 16. It's going to take at least another quarter of improved earnings before we even consider buying Salesforce.com over Google. While eDiets.com was only up $0.01, it was still a gain on a horrible day. Perhaps investors longing for the next episode of the "Biggest Loser" decide to put a few dollars on the stock.
Still, the biggest question is what does today's drop mean to investors? Simply put, we have yet to see the bottom and with the market going under 7600, investors are going to continue to be nervous. While we've started to hear a few so-called experts say the new bottom is 6000, we don't believe the market will go that low unless the government does absolutely nothing to help out the "big three".
And is it so wrong to let Chrysler, Ford (F:NYSE), and GM (GM:NYSE) collapse? After all, some precedent has been set as Washington Mutual was consumed by the FDIC. eTrade is probably emailing Henry Paulson every hour to remind him where he should send the check. Every day that goes by we have to wonder whether or not eTrade will get any of Uncle Sam's money. We think the government will eventually give Detroit's triplets some cash as long as GM pledges to sell Hummers only in Texas and Ford promises to retire the outdated Taurus.
The big problem we see on the horizon is Citigroup (C:NYSE). Like everyone else, we've seen the speculation that Goldman Sachs (GS:NYSE), and State Street (STT:NYSE) might be possible suitors. Why either of these businesses would want to enter the world of commercial banking is beyond our reasoning. There's a reason why you don't see a Goldman Sachs or State Street branch on every other corner. Neither company has the expertise to successfully takeover Citigroup. Aside from possibly making either potential suitor a beneficiary of Mr. Paulson's slush fund, we don't see either company making this move. Without a legitimate savior waiting in the wings, Citigroup better hope they can get their stock price above $5 quickly so mutual funds don't put this company to rest.
Like most investors, we're anxious to see what tomorrow brings. Not because we believe the turnaround could be tomorrow, but because we want to have a better idea as to how much worse it is going to get. If only the market would jump 800 points tomorrow so we could fill-up our tank with $2.38 a gallon super unleaded and not worry about filling the tank before Monday.
Datacastle, a Seattle-based startup that sells PC data protection, has raised $5.3M in Series A funding led by CM Capital Investments. DataCastle's data-protection software targets business laptops in, providing online backup, encryption, and reduction of storage space needed for files.
As part of the deal they hired a new CEO. It seems like he has is work cut out for him, particularly in marketing as Datacastle has almost no presence and doesn't position itself in a compelling fashion.
Did the market's 500-point jump today save the week? Are investors now going to splurge on a bottle of Opus One this weekend instead of the latest Beaujolais Nouveau release? Probably not. But at investors should be slightly comforted by the fact that the market didn't slide further today. The 8.3% drop in the Dow this week has the staff at tech:stocker throwing out our 8000 bottom prediction. Think lower. While there's a good chance investors could honor our Pilgrim forefathers by having some small gains next week (after all, what company with any common sense is going to announce layoffs during Thanksgiving week. Any company who does should fire their PR and IR firms instantly and then cut the people that hired the firms. Preferably the day before Christmas.).
Still, we're not expecting any real positive news until next year. Black Friday is going to be ugly as ten times as many people will be spending the night in line this year to get the four plasma TVs priced $1000. The sad part is that the retail season is going to be so bad this year that everyone will probably have the opportunity to buy that same plasma tv at a price lower than what the people who waited all night in line had to pay.
So if you are going to invest right now, understand that redemptions at hedge funds and mutual funds are going to be fueled by economic uncertainty and they don't have the cash to cover these sales. We expect hedge and mutual funds to continue to dump stocks until the beginning of next year when portfolio managers are fired. When the new managers are hired, expect them to sell a few more stocks before making their first purchases.
Speaking of selling, we weren't surprised that the SEC didn't like one of Mark Cuban's sale of Mamma.com (CNIC:NASDAQ) shares in 2004 (by the way, why was he investing in a company called "Mamma.com – the mother of all search engines". Did he actually think it was going to challenge Google (GOOG:NASDAQ)?). While we could debate whether or not Mr. Cuban did actually receive some insider information, we think it's easier to point to one well-known fact: the SEC doesn't start battles that it can't win. Everyone should remember Martha Steward and her troubles with selling a few shares of ImClone. While Mr. Cuban may have a bigger bank account than Ms. Stewart, he'll be better off using his money to buy cigarettes and other tradable goods in prison versus high-priced attorneys.
We're wondering if Mr. Cuban will employ the "Michael Finley defense" saying that the forward's inability to score his season average in the playoffs led him to make irresponsible move (while a jury would believe, and sympathize with, a "Dirk Nowitzki defense" (or the lack of his Mr. Nowitzki's defense), the reality is that the forward actually topped his season scoring average in the 2004 playoff series against Sacramento). Hopefully Mr. Cuban will stay clear of trying to blame Don Nelson for his troubles.
Unfortunately for Mr. Cuban, his future date with "Bubba" and his cell mates will probably ruin any chance he has of buying the Chicago Cubs. This should have Cubs fans breathing a sigh of relief considering the Dallas Mavericks are probably the biggest disappointment in the NBA this year. Firing Avery Johnson was a mistake and replacing him with Rick Carlisle was an even bigger one. As Dan Snyder is learning with his Washington Redskins, money doesn't buy championships. Until Mr. Cuban hires a quality coach and surrounds him with talent that wants to win (why he thinks the dope smoking Josh Howard is going to help him raise a championship banner is beyond us), his Mavericks will continue to disappoint their fans.
Sticking with quality theme, today's drop should be a reminder that your portfolio with quality companies. We view quality companies as ones that deliver consistent positive earnings and are often seen as leaders in their industry. Often these companies pay a dividend and manage their costs effectively. This being said, we don't see Salesforce.com as a quality company right now. Even though the company knocked the ball out of the park with their recent earnings, we still think their P/E ratio is far too high to even be considered a growth stock. We'll give credit to their investor relations team as they have plenty of people believing that this is a growth stock. In our opinion, this stock has grown too much and needs to deliver some larger profits before we believe the dated PR messages (think 2001 and the "this is the future" messages you heard from every company that had a high P/E ratio) CEO Marc Benioff is selling.
Palo Alto's Zuberance raised $4M in Series A funding from Emergence Capital Partners. We like the concept here but it does seem difficult to pull off. What they are looking at are the clients that any company might have who are early adopters or evangelists for that company. We know it is indeed to make the most of that enthusiasm to bring in new clients. The big challenge that we see for Zuberance is that the pain they are looking to heal is minor all things considered. The pain that Salesforce or SAP address for most companies cannot be ignored. Customer testimonials are crucial but for sure its a minor side dish on the corporate table.
The startup is led by CEO Rob Fuggetta, who was CMO of LongBoard and GoRemote (acquired by iPass) and at Genuity (Verizon spin-out).
While the banks and investors seemed to toast Citigroup's (C:NYSE) good fortune of conning the U.S. Government into lending them a cool $20 billion and guarantee $250 billion of their most toxic assets, the staff at tech:stocker could only shake their heads in disbelief.
First, we're surprised that the government has revised its use of TARP funds to now guarantee risk assets. We're uncertain as to how this move is going to be free-up money so potential homeowners can access credit. Wasn't this part of the original idea behind the TARP? Create stability in the financial institutions so people can buy homes?
Second, we're even more surprised the government let Citigroup's absentee CEO Vikram S. Pandit stay at the helm. Considering how little leadership we've seen from Mr. Pandit during this crisis, we don't understand why the government would trust him to manage $20 billion of taxpayer funds. Citigroup is still hemorrhaging money and needs to restructure its expenses in order to have a future. The Citigroup empire is such a sprawling collection of random outposts that fiscal responsibility is not going to be a part of the corporate culture in the near future.
While we understand that shareholders and potential investors might see the $20 billion as exactly what Citigroup needs to regain investor confidence, ultimately the company has too many challenges to overcome justify even a small increase in the share price. Still, we do hope Uncle Sam's preferred stock (almost 8% of the company) will grow so that it can sell a few shares and diversify their portfolio.
Finally, fellow banks like Bank of America (BAC:NYSE) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM:NYSE) should be excited about the Citigroup deal. Both banks have increased the amount of illiquid assets on their books with the respective acquisitions of Countrywide and Washington Mutual. If they can convince the government to offer them deals similar to Citigroup's, both institutions would have a lot less worries in the near future. And think of the promotion possibilities. Open a new savings account and receive a national parks pass! Open a gold savings account with $250,000 and get a free night at El Torvar. This could be a win for everyone.
Kind of lost in today's news was Hewlett Packard's (HPQ:NASDAQ) stellar earning's release. While many people might look at the numbers and say they were just good, you have to remember that HP's Q4 closed on October 31, not September 30 like most other tech companies. The Q4 net revenue increase of $5.3 billion from a year earlier is outstanding but even more impressive is what happened within the Personal Systems Group (PSG).
While many analysts have been predicting doom and gloom for PC sales, the opposite was occurring within PSG. Revenue in the group grew 10% as Notebook revenue increased by 21% while desktop revenue only decreased by 2%. We have no problem with decrease in desktop sales as new WiFi networks continue to be introduced and businesses try to control costs by allowing employees to work from home, Desktop sales will become more focused on users who need the power of a desktop model or corporations whose employees only need basic functionality on their computers.
The Imaging and Printing Group (IPG) didn't fare so well as consumer hardware revenue dropped 21% while commercial hardware revenue faired a little better dropping 10%. Even with these losses in revenue, the group only saw a 1% decline in revenue.
CEO Mark Hurd prides himself on an experienced management team that knows how to control costs. This is extremely apparent in the IPG division. While we have a lot of respect for Mr. Hurd and his ability to run an efficient business, it will be interesting to see how he attempts to boost sagging sales in the IPG division in the near future.
While HP's earnings announcement may not have had the same impact on the tech industry as Citigroup's bailout did on financial services, companies like Apple (AAPL:NASDAQ), Dell (DELL:NASDAQ), and Intel (INTC:NASDAQ) should feel a little better about the future. While we had a much more optimistic outlook for HP back in September, our revised 12-month of target price of $43 per share is much more of a reflection of the current economy than the company.
There are some Internet niches that we have to admit we never saw coming. Growing up we were accustomed to the myriad scalpers at sports and concert events. Mike Damone in Fast Times at Ridgmont High even had a brief scene scalping concert tickets at the mall and that felt right.
Another startup that has taken this practice online is FanSnap out of Palo Alto. The live event ticket search engine has raised $5.5M in 2nd-round funding led by return backer General Catalyst Partners. The face-man here is CEO Mike Janes, who was former CMO of StubHub.
Meta search engines have worked well in high end eCommerce territories like travel. A big market for meta search for tickets seems like a stretch but again we have sold this market short in the past.
We covered then London-based LiveRail back in July 2007 when it launched. Today we catch up the video ad network and learn that it has re-located to San Francisco and has raised $500K in Series A funding led by Pond Venture Partners.
LiveRail launched in a crowded market for video ad services but has more recently focused on a less crowded niche with the launch of LiveRail for the iPhone. This is an ad platform that allows iPhone app developers to embed video advertisements into their apps, which play immediately after launching an apps.
LiveRail is led by Mark Trefgarne as CEO who was Managing Director of London-based internet strategy consultancy firm Cleartide. Seed funding was provided by private investors including Cleartide.
After taking a few days off to spend some time with the family, the staff at tech:stocker was happy to return on the fourth straight day of gains in the Dow. Up almost 10% for the week, it almost makes you wish there was trading tomorrow so we didn't have to wait until Monday for more gains. But the reality is, we think some of the profits will be returned on Monday.
While early reports on Black Friday suggest there were almost as many people shopping as there were last year, these people were looking for the $300 laptop at Best Buy (BBY:NYSE) or their $5.99 Blu-Ray discs. While both offerings help the public relations machine churn out nice visuals for the local television stations, the profits margins on both must be razor thin. We also believe that if customers aren't able to purchase the "doorbuster" deal they had their hearts set on, they are not going to purchase a slightly discounted HP – Pavillion laptop as a consolation prize. While the retailers are going to try position today as a success considering the current economic woes consumers are facing, we recommend staying away from retail stocks and waiting for better sales as the season progresses.
Speaking of Hewlett Packard (HPQ:NYSE), we are surprised that there latest quarterly earnings release hasn't had more of a halo effect on the tech sector. Especially considering the quarter included October's numbers – widely believed to be the month that will ruin the earnings of all tech companies in the New Year. While we didn't expect Dell (DELL:NYSE) to have much of a bounce as they are still trying to figure out how to return to the prominence (and sales) of yesterdays, we thought Apple (AAPL:NASDAQ) would get a better lift considering their continued gains in PC sales along with semiconductor stalwart Intel (INTC:NASDAQ). The lack of pop in either suggests that investors are sitting on the sidelines until they get a better understanding of the tech sector. Even if investors are trying to get a better understanding of this industry, Hewlett Packard still remains a solid buy.
One tech company that did have a great week was Salesforce.com (CRM:NASDAQ). Up over 25%, we're kind of left wondering why investors have returned to this stock, especially when the P/E ratio is just south of 100. One of our moles on the trading floor said the stock was beneficiary of the "Cramer effect". Our mole said Jim Cramer was once again pimping CEO Marc Benioff and his company on Mad Money. While we have a tremendous amount of respect for Mr. Cramer and his trading skills, we don't know why he feels the need to give a plethora of "booyahs" to Mr. Benioff and Salesforce.com? We can only wonder how many shares Mr. Cramer has in his portfolio to have Mr. Benioff on two months in a row and to refer to the company as a growth stock. We give a big "boono" on the growth stock reference and thinks the company's increase in share value is a temporary fad.
Another stock that had a big bounce this week is eTrade (ETFC:NASDAQ) up almost 40% for the week. The increase can be directly attributed to their issuing a 49-word press release (not including title and boilerplate) saying they are trying to play nice with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and his staff so they can get TARP funding. With the recent increase in share price, the company is almost worth as much as the amount they are requesting ($726 million versus $750 million). Aside from the fact that eTrade is asking for way too much money, we're not sure why Mr. Paulson hasn't thrown a few dollars at eTrade considering how many weeks it has been since they first applied for the money. After all, Citigroup (C:NASDAQ) got $20 billion after a weekend's worth of negotiating. Is eTrade a low priority for Mr. Paulson and his staff or is CEO Donald Layton wasting everyone's time by trying to negotiate ludicrous terms or won't back down from his initial request because his company desperately needs every penny. Regardless of the situation, we recommend dumping any eTrade shares during this period of brief respite.
And while we're happy with four days of gains, we believe investors will try to lock in some gains next week. While we don't believe in day trading, locking in a few profits on Monday wouldn't be such a bad idea. We definitely don't believe the economy is going to show any real signs of recovery until 2009 so this "rally" is not going to last, especially when retailers are forced to reveal the numbers for Black Friday.
In this financial storm, investors seem to find some solace in new media startups for some reason. Ad revenues may be falling but the wisdow seems to be that successful, online only media startups will replace the likes of Time Inc. and Conde Nast and we can't argue with that.
Today came news that Huffington Post took a $25M investment from Oak Investment Partners in its 3rd round, bringing its total capital raised to $37M.
What's the plan? Previously it seemed that the company was raising capital to pay for head count ahead of revenues. Now it seems they have grander plans to expand into business, green/clean tech and investigative journalism.
Huffington Post does as good as job as anyone at the art of blood sucking off of the corpse of old media. The firm's namesake Arianna regularly appears on Larry King, NPR and elsewhere to draw attention to the site. Then she creates some headlines around links to content created by old media such as Comedy Central clips and MSNBC stories. While there is a fair amount of blog content, we expect that most of the traffic goes to content produced by others and yet it gets more traffic than most any newspaper or broadcast site which spends vast sums to create that. It's terrible to see.
The big news of the day is that the U.S. is in a recession and that's why the market dropped over 600 points today. Anyone who is actively trading stocks and sold today because of the recession news should sell whatever they have left in their equities portfolio and consider investing in Shepard Fairey prints that can easily be flipped on eBay (EBAY:NASDAQ).
Back in April (before this column launched) we were telling people that the country was in a recession and were always greeted with the same refrain, "but we haven't had two consecutive quarters of negative gross domestic product (GDP) and that's the definition of a recession." Unfortunately for them, negative GDP is only one indicator of a recession.
Our case for stating a recession back in April was increasing unemployment numbers, decreasing payrolls, and lack of home sales. While most economists don't factor in homes sales, the staff at tech:stocker believes this is a strong factor in determining the health of an economy. When people can't sell their homes, it usually means they can't refinance or draw upon their equity. This usually leads to a tightening of the household spending. Retailers start feeling the pain when household spending budgets are reduced and the gross domestic product starts heading down the slope of a recession.
And the same people who gave us the negative GDP spiel also tacked on, "you don't know you're in a recession until the country is on the road to recovery." This is always our favorite statement as it assumes recessions are short. Seldom is this true but taking this statement into account, if people were selling today because they learned of a recession, wouldn't they be selling at the wrong time? After all, aren't we supposed to be recovering from our economic tumble instead of waiting for the big crash at the bottom of the hill?
Blaming today's drop entirely on the shocking news of a recession would be a mistake. Reviewing the gains the market made last week, we think quite a few people acted on our suggestion to lock in some gains (let's be honest. A much greater number of people acted on our suggestion than the combined readership of this column and the Wall St. Journal).
So if we're right and today's drop was a bunch of greedy profit takers who can't sit on stock more than a week, should you buy tomorrow? If you are looking at quality stocks in the tech sector, the answer is yes. While tech wasn't hit as hard today as financial services, we believe there are some extremely attractive stocks in the tech industry.
Number one bargain on our list is Apple (AAPL:NASDAQ). Now that the Christmas season is upon us, what better gift for the cost conscious shopper to purchase than an iPhone or an iPod? While many thrifty shoppers may not be able to spend their precious cash on the tech status symbol iPhone, prying open their wallet to spend $49 on an iPod shuffle shouldn't be too hard and will definitely please a teenager (especially when they consider the crap their parents could have bought).
While a lot of people like Hewlett Packard (HPQ:NYSE), we don't see the enthusiasm for buying their latest notebooks and printers. We see it as the difference between buying a Dodge Caravan to cart the kids around versus a Porsche Cayenne. While both do the job, you are much more psyched about picking up the tots from ballet in the Porsche Cayenne than you are the Dodge Caravan.
And in a season where everyone is looking for the "door buster" bargains, Apple's stock wins that battle hands down. Apple stock has dropped more than 56% since its 52-week high of $202.96 compared to HP's market rate decline of 37%. While investor's migh point to Apple's significantly higher P/E ratio of 16.6 (HP sports a modest P/E ratio of 10.3), we can accept the higher number when you factor in Mr. Jobs' track record of introducing products that everyone wants to imitate (iPhone, iPod, and MacBook Air for starters).
While we like both stocks over the next 12 months, Apple has a little more room to grow considering how far they have fallen. We are putting a conservative 12-month target of $130 on the stock as they could easily surpass that total if investors realize they are one of the few computer manufacturers worth buying in the near term.
A social network for the rich, Total Prestige, has raised $1M to compete with the likes of A Small World, says PaidContent.
We don't buy into Total Prestige for any number of reasons: 1) The name is dumb. 2) The site claims 650 members. We have more than that in LinkedIn and they are rich. How is that a business? 3) The site raised funding from Frank DeRose, a founding partner of NYC-based private equity firm Ferrata Capital who is expected to be named CEO. We could be wrong, but we expect the guy knows nothing about building a social network business but thinks it's easy next to figuring out derivatives.
A buddy in big scale construction regales us with nightmare stories about hoodlums who blackmail his company to "protect" construction sites in the Bay Area. You don't pay for construction, you get your gear stolen. Traditional remedies are to buy a dog or pay a security company to station a retired cop all night at the site, but those are expensive and ineffective we suspect.
With that in mind we like San Francisco's Roc2Loc, which sells mobile security devices to protect construction sites, RVs, empty homes, etc. The startup has secured $2M of a $5M Series A round led by Claremont Creek Ventures says PEwire.
With today's 270 point gain, a few people must feel pretty stupid pinning yesterday's drop in the market on the recession proclamation. Sure the "experts" can say that the market "overreacted" to the news but the reality is that's not the case. The staff at tech:stocker were slightly comforted by today's gain as the Dow didn't have to drop to 8000, or slightly below, before having a nice lift. But don't let that comfort lull you into a false sense of confidence.
With layoffs of 30,000 announced between Bank of America (BAC:NYSE) and Merrill Lynch (MER:NYSE), this announcement will only make it more difficult for the 53,000 that are to be laid off from Citigroup (C:NYSE) to find a job. In addition, JPMorgan Chase (JPM:NYSE) will be laying off 9,200 at the dearly departed Washington Mutual. Our insiders at JPMorgan Chase say that the 3000 investment bankers the company plans to let go are only the tip of the iceberg. Expect bigger cuts in the future. Fidelity investments is trimming 2.6% of its global staff but our insiders say the Johnson family needs to go a lot deeper, and will, to keep the family living the lifestyle they are accustomed to.
The reason we are mentioning these layoffs is because these financial services leaders are not planning on the current recession ending in the near future and neither should you. The staff at tech:stocker firmly believes that the financial services industry will lead the economic recovery as they have taken the largest hits in valuation. This being said, if they are "lightening their load" so they can go the distance, then investors need to take this into account when they put their valuable investment dollars into a stock. With analysts expecting Goldman Sachs (GS:NYSE) to have a horrific quarter, we believe very few firms in this industry are going to be proud of their earnings reports.
While we don't recommend selling any investments in financial services right now (unless you own eTrade (ETFC:NYSE) or CIT Group (CIT:NYSE)), we do recommend caution when buying any company in this industry. With the current quarter expected to produce large losses for most companies, we recommend sitting on the sidelines and waiting for the dip after they announce quarterly results.
This being said, we decided to revisit a holiday favorite, Amazon.com (AMZN:NYSE).
Overall, we are not in favor of the retail industry as it is extremely obvious that people are trying to stretch their dollars and refrain from overloading the plastic. If you do see us recommending Wal-Mart (WMT:NYSE) or JC Penny (JCP:NYSE), assume the column has been hijacked by Internet terrorists and stop reading immediately.
Amazon piques our interest for several reasons. First, we have to assume that people who frequent Amazon are fairly savvy shoppers who understand that Amazon's true value goes beyond its low prices. Being able to avoid the crowds at Best Buy (BBY:NYSE) and Target (TGT:NYSE) is definitely worth paying a little more, especially when you factor in opportunity costs and the price of gas (and for many of the us, the price of a decent glass of single malt (or two) to help regain our sanity after shopping). This type of shopper usually has a solid Christmas, or Chanukah, fund that would significantly boost the average amount spent per customer.
We also like how Amazon does not need to spend as much on advertising to draw in customers. Not having to throw money at weekly circulars is definitely an advantage over its brick and mortar competitors. And online features like "what do customers ultimately buy after viewing this item" usually have us spending more than we planned. But we never complain about the extra money spent.
If Amazon is going to show they have matured as a company, having a solid quarter in this moribund economy would prove they have grown up. Even though they reduced their guidance for the quarter, we think they have a solid chance of beating those numbers.
Our main concern for this stock is that their P/E ratio, 27.72, is a little high for our liking. While it's not residing in the land of absurdity like Saleforce.com's P/E ratio, we would feel even more comfortable if it were lower right now. This being said, we're still putting a 12-month target of $50 per share. And when they hit our target, we promise we'll buy a new Blu Ray player and plasma TV from Amazon.
NYC-based trading platform Liquidnet says it will delay its IPO plans to until 2010. The firm had planned to do an IPO this quarter of this year and to raise up to $500M.
“Back when we filed to do an IPO, Citibank was trading at $50, Goldman Sachs was at $150 or something … a lot has changed since we filed (in July),” Seth Merrin, founder and CEO, told Reuters in an interview.
The decision of course makes sense but it has to be painful for its backers: which include TH Lee Putnam Ventures, Summit Partners and Technology Crossover Ventures. LiquidNet was founded in 1999 so a pay-day has been a long time coming.
The company created a trading platform and is now in the top ten financial exchanges. From the CEO's statement, particularly where he says the plan no layoffs but just some hiring slow-down, it seems that the balance sheet remains solid but they don't want an IPO disaster.